SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 3069

S.TAMILVANAN
N. Hiriyan – Appellant
Versus
B. Sivakumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Subramanian, Advocate.
For the Respondent:I.C. Vasudevan, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. The second appeal has been preferred challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 21.08.2007 made in A.S.No.80 of 2006 on the file of the Sub-Court, Udhagamandalam, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 29.09.2006 made in O.S.No.124 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif, Kothagiri.

2. The unsuccessful plaintiff before the trial court is the appellant herein. The suit was filed by the appellant / plaintiff, before the trial court, seeking damages to the tune of Rs.25,000/-from the respondent / defendant with costs, on the ground that the defendant had sent a petition to the District Collector, Nilgris, containing false and defamatory averments.

3. The appellant / plaintiff has stated in the plaint that he was serving as Village Administrative Officer (VAO) of Konavakorai village, as a post-graduate, having sufficient means and reputation in the village. The village to which he belongs is the revenue village of Naduhatty and there are many Revenue villages within the territory of Kaigar at Pedthala of Nilgris District.

4. According to the appellant / plaintiff, the respondent / defendant had migrated from Kalinganatty village to Byangi village few years prior to the














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top