K.K.SASIDHARAN, PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
S. V. Tharanath – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Rep. by its Chairman – Respondent
1. The respondent in writ appeal No. 924 of 2014 is the petitioner in this review petition.
The facts:
2. The petitioner was transferred by Chennai Zone of State Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as Bank) from Chennai to Gouhati by order dated 2 May 2014. The said transfer order was challenged in W.P. No. 13611 of 2014. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition by order dated 15 May 2014. The Bank challenged the order dated 15 May 2014 in W.A. No. 924 of 2014. The Division Bench was pleased to allow the intra court appeal by judgment dated 7 November 2014. The petitioner, alleging that there is an error apparent on the face of record filed this review petition invoking Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
3. The petitioner raised the following issues to review the judgment in W.A. No. 924 of 2014.
(i) The petitioner was under the impression that the appeal would be dismissed on account of the observation made by the Division Bench that instead of filing the appeal, the Bank could have passed a fresh order for transfer.
(ii) The Division Bench has not taken the consent of parties for disposal of writ appeal at the time of admission.
(iii) The tra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.