R.SUBBIAH
S. Rathinammal – Appellant
Versus
C. Chamundeeswari – Respondent
R. SUBBIAH, J.
1. The present application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs to grant an order of ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents 13 to 16/defendants 13 to 16, their men, agents, servants or anybody claiming right either under or through them from in any manner altering or changing the character of item No. II of the suit schedule properties pending disposal of the suit in C.S. No. 610 of 2013.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as per their ranking in the civil suit.
3. The plaintiffs have filed the suit in C.S. No. 610 of 2013 as against the defendants for a declaration, declaring that the partition deed dated 27.2.2002 registered as document No. 1326 of 2002 in the office of the Sub Registrar, Sembium, executed between the defendants 5 and 6 along with their brother S. Chandrasekaran, as null and void and for other incidental reliefs. Pending suit, the plaintiffs have filed the present application for interim injunction.
4. The case of the plaintiffs as could be seen in the affidavit in support of the application, in nutshell, is set out hereunder:-
(a) Before narrating the facts of the case, for easy understanding,
G. Ganesan and Other Versus P. Sundari, R. Varalakshmi and M. Kasthuri
Padmavathy Ammal Versus Pachaiyappa Nainar and Rangasamy Nainar
Narendra Kante Versus Anuradha Kante and Others
Kishorsinh Ratansinh Jadeja Versus Maruti Corporation and Others
Best Seelers Retain (India) Private Limited Versus Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited and Others
M. Kabali and Others Versus Arulmighu Shri Ellaiamman Koil, Rep. by its Trustee K. Selvaraj
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.