SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 4099

M.JAICHANDREN, ARUNA JAGADEESAN
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent


Judgment

M. Jaichandren, J.

1. This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed praying that this Court may be pleased to grant an order of interim injunction restraining the first respondent from alienating the schedule mentioned property, in the suit, in O.S.No.53 of 2011, on the file of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, pending disposal of the Appeal Suit.

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner/appellant and in view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the Miscellaneous Petition, we find that the suit filed by the petitioner/appellant in O.S.No.53 of 2011, praying for a direction to the first respondent to pay a sum of Rs.17,20,000/- and for a decree of permanent injunction, had been dismissed, by the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore, by his judgment and decree, dated 27.02.2014.

3. In such circumstances, we do not find sufficient cause or reason to grant the relief, as prayed for by the petitioner/appellant, in the present Miscellaneous Petition. Hence, M.P.No.1 of 2014 stands dismissed. However, we make it clear that the encumbrance or alienation of the property i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top