SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 4143

N.PAUL VASANTHAKUMAR, P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
S. Chandramohan – Appellant
Versus
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Jayees B. Dolia for M/s. Aiyar & Dolia, Advocates.

Judgment

N. Paul Vasanthakumar, J.

1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners challenging the order passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, in Crl.M.P.No.979 of 2014 dated 19.3.2014 under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.

2. The Bank of Baroda, second respondent herein, filed Crl.M.P.No.979 of 2014 before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, contending that at the request of the petitioners and third respondent, the Bank sanctioned cash credit limit of Rs.250 lakhs on 31.12.2008, which was subsequently increased as Cash Credit Hype Review of Rs.250 lakhs and Working Capital Demand Loan of Rs.50 lakhs. For availing the said loan, the petitioners and the third respondent have executed various documents in favour of the bank and also agreed to repay the loan amount together with interest.

3. The third respondent herein was the Principal Debtor of the loan. Petitioners herein are mortgagors/absolute owners of the properties mentioned in the schedule and the title deeds of the properties were also mortgaged. Petitioners and third respondent committed wilful default in spite of various demands and requests, and hence the loan account became NPA on 31.3.201

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top