1. The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking the issue of a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider his representation for initiating action against the respondents 2 and 3 under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 and also to prohibit the respondents 2 and 3 from appearing for the fourth respondent Wakf Board in a revision petition pending on the file of this Court.

2. Heard Mr. A. Abdul Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents 2 and 3, who are Advocates practising in this Court, were his lawyers and that they have now started appearing for the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, opposing the petitioner herein. Therefore, contending that the respondents 2 and 3 are guilty of professional misconduct, the petitioner sent a complaint to the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry. The complaint was allegedly given on 03.11.2014. Immediately within four days, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking a Mandamus to direct the Bar Council to look into his complaint and also to prevent the respondents 2 and 3 from appearing for the Wakf Board against the petitione