SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Mad) 4867

K.VENKATARAMAN
Selin Raja alias Maria Selin Raj – Appellant
Versus
Lawrence alias Lawrence Antonia – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Ms. S. Geetha, for Petitioner

ORDER

1. Even though the respondent has been served and the name of the respondent appears in the cause list, the respondent has not chosen to appear before this Court either in person or through a pleader. Hence, the matter is decided on merits.

2. The petitioner husband has come up with the present transfer petition against his wife, the respondent herein, for transfer of D.V. No. 2587 of 2011, which is pending on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, to the file of III Additional Judge, Family Court, Chennai, to be tried along with O.P. Nos. 93 of 2011 and 603 of 2011.

3. To contradict the reason set out in the affidavit, no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent. As stated already, the respondent is not present before this Court.

4. That apart, Section 26 of The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, gives ample power to the Family Court to deal with the proceedings initiated by the wife under the Domestic Violence Act.

5. In view of the above stated position, I am of the considered view that the request of the petitioner has to be acceded to.

6. The learned X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore is directed to transmit all the papers pertaini



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top