SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 162

R.MALA
Sadishkumar – Appellant
Versus
State Rep. By The Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellants: AR.L. Sundaresan, SC.
For the Respondent: V.MR. Rajendran, APP.

Judgment

1. The criminal appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and sentence, dated 20.04.2006 made in S.C.No.368 of 2006 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Tract Court NO.I), Coimbatore, whereby the accused through charged under Sections 395 and 397 IPC, convicted for the offence under Section 392 IPC and sentenced to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each in default, to undergo three months simple imprisonment. Against which, the present appeal has been filed.

2. The case of the prosecution is as follows:

(i) On the side of the prosecution, P.W.1 to P.W.9 were examined; Exs.P.1 to P.9 and M.O.1 to M.O.5 were marked.

(ii) P.W.1/Nagaraj, P.W.2/Murugesan, P.W.3/Marudhachalam, P.W.4/Arokiyam and P.W.5/Veerasamy were working as Security Officers in South India Viscose Company. On 02.06.2006 P.W.1 to P.W.5 were in security duty at South India Viscose Company. At about 1.00 p.m., when they were in patrol duty, they heard a noise from the northern side of the Factory. When they went to the place from where they heard the noise, they saw two vehicles, namely, TVS Star City and TVS XL Super motor cycle containing Aluminim


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top