1. Mr. A. Jeyaraman, learned Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents and by consent of both the parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved against the order of the second respondent, dated 21.11.2013 and consequently, seeks a direction to the respondents to settle the pension and terminal benefits available due to the death of the petitioner's husband and also to provide compassionate appointment to the petitioner.

3. Though the writ petition was filed with such a prayer, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied, if only, the terminal benefits are given to her.

4. The case of the petitioner is as follows:-

Her husband was appointed as Tradesman in the respondents Corporation and died on 25.09.2013 after working for more than 29 years. Her husband earlier married one Usha in the year 1983. There was some matrimonial dispute between the petitioner's husband and the said Usha and H.M.O.P No.117 of 1994 was filed seeking divorce. A consent decree was passed. Thereafter, the deceased married the petitioner on 29.10.1987, and out of th