SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 345

S.MANIKUMAR
Mohammed Irfan – Appellant
Versus
Mahammed Sabir – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Jayasri Baskarm, Advocate.
For the Respondent:S. Senthilkumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

S. MANIKUMAR, J.

1. Criminal Revision is directed against the order made in CMP No. 651 of 2012 dated 12.10.2012 in C.C. No. 250 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam, dismissing the petition filed under Section 191 Cr. P.C.

2. Material on record discloses that the petitioner, has issued four cheques dated 15.10.2009 bearing Nos. 360370 to 360373 each for a sum of Rs. 1,99,000/- cheques presented in ICICI Bank by the respondent have been returned with an endorsement dated 16.10.2009 on the depositor's instruction to stop payment. Thereafter, the respondent issued a statutory notice dated 24.10.2009, which has been acknowledged on 28.10.2009 by the petitioner, alleging commission of offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Complaint preferred has been taken on record in C.C. No. 250 of 2009 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam.

3. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the parties in this revision petition that when C.C. No. 250 of 2009 was posted for cross examination of PW1, CMP No. 651 of 2012 under Section 191 Cr. P.C., was filed by the revision petitioner to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it has no terri












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top