P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Chitra – Appellant
Versus
Kannan – Respondent
P.R. SHIVAKUMAR, J.
1. This Revision has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India questioning the legality of the order dated 09.11.2010 made by the trial Judge, namely, the learned 3rd Additional District Munsif, Kallakurichi, in I.A. No. 2245 of 2010 in O.S. No. 40 of 2008 on the file of the said Court.
2. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff in the above said suit and the respondent herein is the sole defendant in the said suit. The suit came to be filed by the revision petitioner for a bare perpetual injunction not to interfere with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property (immovable property) described in the plaint schedule. The claim was based on the plaint averment that she purchased the property from the rightful owner by a sale deed dated 21.08.2002 and that ever since the purchase, she had been in possession and enjoyment of the same. No averment was found incorporated in the plaint indicating that the title of the plaintiff was in dispute. Hence, the suit was valued under Section 27(c) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act 1955.
3. The respondent herein/sole defendant, who entered appearance after receiving summon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.