SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, M.VENUGOPAL
Thejas Vijayan – Appellant
Versus
Phonex Arc, Assignee of Barclays Bank – Respondent
M. Venugopal, J.
1. The Petitioner has preferred the instant Writ Petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the records of the order dated 03.12.2013 in M.A.No.118 of 2013 passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai.
2. The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, while passing the impugned order in M.A.No.118 of 2013, on 03.12.2013, had observed to the effect that 'It is seen that the respondent is the assignee of Barclays Bank and that it had already filed the assignment deed and that by inadvertence the page containing the details of the loan availed by the appellant had not been filed in the annexure and that the Ld. Presiding Officer has permitted the filing of the said page before the tribunal below. The applicant in the OA cannot be denied the opportunity to prove its case before the tribunal below and the order of the Ld. Presiding Officer allowing the filing of a page which had been left out by inadvertence has only ensured that the respondent is not denied its right to establish its case before the tribunal below more particularly when the appellant has failed to demonstrate any prejudice and such being the case this tribu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.