SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1023

R.MALA
B. Uma Maheswari – Appellant
Versus
Petchiammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Lakshmi Narasimhan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M.N. Balakrishnan, Advocate.

Judgment

R. Mala, J.

1. This Criminal Appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal dated 29.11.2007 made in C.C.No.127 of 2006 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Udumalpet.

2. The appellant as a complainant preferred a private complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter called as “the Act”) stating that the respondent/accused has borrowed a sum of Rs.1,75,000/- on 15.10.2004 and executed a promissory note. When the appellant demanded the money, the respondent paid the interest and issued Ex.P1 cheque dated 06.02.2006 for the principal amount. When the appellant presented the cheque for encashment, it was returned as "account closed" as per return memo Ex.P2. So the appellant issued Ex.P3 statutory notice to the respondent on 08.02.2006 and the acknowledgment card was marked as Ex.P4. The respondent after receiving notice, neither she sent any reply nor repaid the amount. Therefore, the appellant/complainant was constrained to file a private complaint against the respondent/accused under Section 138 of the Act.

3. The trial Court has taken cognizance of an offence, after following the procedure and recording sworn statement. Since the acc



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top