SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1001

P.DEVADASS
T. Sundar – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police, C. I. D. , Puducherry – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:P.S. Ganesh & Associates, Advocates.
For the Respondents: The Special Public Prosecutor Puducherry.

ORDER

1. Since there is common factual matrix, common arguments have been heard and thus this common order is being rendered.

2. Petitioners are members of Puducherry Police.

3. Out of them petitioner Rajaram has now retired.

4. Petitioners seeks anticipatory bail. Their details are as under:-

S. No.

Crl. O.P. No.

Name

Rank

Post

1.

225/15

T. Sundar

A-18

Inspector of Police

2.

330/15

V. Yuvaraj

A-10

Inspector of Police

3.

384/15

A. Anusa Basha

A-12

S.I. of Police

4.

657/15

V. Rajaram

A-16

S.I. Police (Retd.)

5.

840/15

B. Kumaravel

A-11

Head Constable

6.

841/15

R. Balakrishnan

A-15

S.I. of Police

7.

1331/15

G. Sankar

A-13

Police Constable

8.

2387/15

Selvakumar

A-17

Spl. Grade Police Constable

5. Learned Senior Counsels and the learned counsels appearing for the petitioners have submitted that the petitioners have been implicated in this case. Petitioners are not named in the FIR. Long after the registration























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top