SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1156

M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Ramasubbu – Appellant
Versus
R. Muthulakshmi Ammal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:R. Sundar Srinivasan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: M.M.E. Philips, Legal Aid Counsel.

Judgment

1. Criminal Appeal No.298 of 2005 arises out of an order of acquittal in C.A.No.197 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court-II, Madurai which reversed the order of conviction in C.C.No.634 of 1998 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurai. Similarly, Criminal Appeal No.299 of 2005 arises out of an order of acquittal in C.A.No.196 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District and Sessions Judge cum Fast Track Court-II, Madurai, which reversed the order of conviction in C.C.No.633 of 1998, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. II, Madurai.

2. Since both the appeals arise out of the issuance of three cheques in pursuant to the agreement marked as Ex.P -7, dated 11.01.1998, both the appeals are disposed of, by this common judgment.

3. A perusal of the materials available on record in the form of typed set of documents and additional typed set of documents would disclose the following facts:-

An agreement dated 20.07.1997 came into being between the appellant/private complainant and respondents, namely, Ramakarishnan son of Sundaram Pillai (No.1), R.Muthulakshmi Ammal (No.2) wife of Ramakrishnan and their sons, name











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top