SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1278

R.MALA
P. V. Sarguru – Appellant
Versus
State Rep by its Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For the Appellant:S. Ashok Kumar, Senior Counsel for R. Karthikeyan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:V. Arul, Government Advocate (Crl. Side).

Judgment

1. This Criminal Appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 20.02.2008 made in C.C.No.7 of 2001 on the file of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai whereby the appellant/accused is convicted and sentenced as follows:

Sections

Sentences

7 of P.C.Act

Two years R.I, Fine of Rs.5000/- in default Three months S.I.

 

13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of P.C. Act

Two years R.I, Fine of Rs.5000/- in default Six months S.I.

The Sentences imposed on the accused are ordered to run concurrently. Set off was also ordered under Section 428 Cr.P.C

2. The case of the prosecution based on the prosecution witnesses is as follows:

(a) P.W.2/Shanmugaraj is running a STD, Xerox, Fax, Digital Colour Lab and Internet business in the name and style of 'Lalitha Telecom Centre' at Door No.11/2, Hotel Imphala Shopping Complex, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai with ten computers and air-conditioned facilities. On 12.08.2000, at around 1.30 P.M, there was a fire in the electric met




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top