R.SUBBIAH
Ilaiyaraja – Appellant
Versus
B. Narsimhasn, Agi Music Pvt. , Ltd. – Respondent
Heard Mr.S.K.Rakhunathan, learned counsel appearing for the applicant (plaintiff) in A.No.7701/2014 and O.A.Nos.760 to 762 of 2014, Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant (second defendant) in A.No.6795/2014, Mr.S.Vijayaraghavan, learned counsel for the fourth defendant and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned counsel for the fifth defendant.
2. Applicant in A.No.7701, 760 to 762 of 2014 is the plaintiff in C.S.No.625 of 2011 and the respondents are the defendants 1 to 5 in the Suit. The applicant in Application No.6795 of 2014 is the second defendant in the said suit. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred as per their rankings in the suit.
3. Application No.7701 of 2014 has been filed under Order 14 Rule 8 of O.S. rules read with Order 2 Rule 2 of C.P.C., to grant leave to the applicant/plaintiff to file a separate suit, for the reliefs reserved by the applicant/plaintiff.
4. Original Application No.760 of 2014 has been filed by the plaintiff to grant ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from violating the rights of the plaintiff in respect of the suit schedule mentioned films, in any way, particularly by entering into or attempting to ente
G.Vasantha Bai Vs. Speical Commissioner and Commissioner (Land Reforms) Chepauk, Madras 5
Harkirat Singh Vs. Amrinder Singh (2005) 13 SCC 511
S.P.Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. V.Jagannath (AIR 1994 SC 853)
Multichannel (India) Litd Mumbai Vs. Kavitalaya Productions Pvt. Ltd, Chennai
Harkirat Singh Vs. Amrinder Singh
Popat and Kotecha Property Vs. State Bank of India Staff Association (2005) 7 SCC 510
M/s.Ferdous Finance (P) Ltd. Vs. R.Thyagarajan (2005) 3 LW 145
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.