SATISH K.AGNIHOTRI, M.VENUGOPAL
T. R. B. Complex Building Owners Welfare Association, rep by its President P. Balamurugan, Consultant – Appellant
Versus
Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, rep by its Member-Secretary – Respondent
Satish K.Agnihotri, J.
1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to take follow up action pursuant to the action / orders issued by the first respondent in Notice No.D/132/AE/003/2014 dated 10.2.2014, No.D/132/AE/004/2014 dated 10.2.2014, No.D/132/AE/005/2014, dated 17.2.2014, No.D/132/AE/006/2014 dated 17.2.2014, No.E/132/AE/007/2014 dated 3.9.2014 and No.D/132/AE/008/2014 dated 3.9.2014.
2. The petitioner had come up earlier with a writ petition, being W.P.No.24816 of 2014, seeking a direction to the official respondents to take urgent action on the representation made by the petitioner dated 15.09.2013 and 9.7.2014 for removal of encroachment allegedly made by the private respondents 6 and 7 in violation of the planning permission. The Corporation of Chennai, in response, appeared before the Court and informed that the Corporation had already issued a separate notice dated 3.9.2014, calling upon the private respondents 6 and 7 to discontinue the occupation of the premises in question. Recording the submission of the Corporation, the petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. Now, the petitioner association has come u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.