PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
A. Kamal Batcha – Appellant
Versus
Gokulam Ammal – Respondent
1. The Court auction purchaser is the revision petitioner herein.
2. A few facts which are necessary for the disposal of this Civil Revision Petition are as follows:-
O.S.No.7 of 1973 was filed for partition on the file of the Sub-Court, Kumbakonam. A preliminary decree was passed on 19/11/1974. An appeal against the same in A.S.No.14 of 1977 was filed on the file of the District Court, Thanjavur. On 24/2/1977, the appeal was dismissed. As the property was not capable of being divided, it was decided to sell the property in Court auction. Accordingly, on 25/1/1978, the Court auction was held. On 20/1/1979, the sale was confirmed by virtue of an order passed in I.A.No.451 of 1977. On the same day, i.e., on 20/1/1974, a final decree was passed. There was also an appeal against the final decree in A.S.No.146 of 1977. On 28/2/1980, the said appeal was dismissed. While so, the parties preferred another suit for the same relief of partition in O.S.No.78 of 1984. The said suit was dismissed on 12/2/1986 and the appeal against the same was also dismissed.
3. Pending appeal, C.M.P.No.8652 of 2000 was filed by the auction purchaser for amendment and correction of the description o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.