SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1127

M.SATHYANARAYANAN
Gangadharan – Appellant
Versus
State represented by, The Sub Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:J. Ashok for M/s. Jeyapaul Associates, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R1, S. Prabha, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side), R2, K.N. Govardhanan, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. The revision petitioner was arrayed as one of the accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C., vide impugned order dated 04.09.2014, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi and challenging the legality of the said order, the present Criminal Revision Case is filed.

2. The second respondent herein had lodged a complaint on the file of Vadakadu Police Station, Pudukkottai District, against Gangadharan, s/o.Paulsamy (the revision petitioner herein); Palsamy, s/o.Raman; Karuppaiah, s/o.Raman and Palanichamy, s/o.Raman, on 06.05.2013 with regard to the commission of the offences which took place on 30.04.2013. The first respondent, on receipt of the complaint from the second respondent, has registered a case in Cr.No.51 of 2013, on 06.05.2013, for the alleged commission of the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(2) I.P.C.

3. The first respondent, after investigation, has filed the charge sheet/final report, against A.2, A.3 and A.4, thus:

Accused (as per Charge sheet)

Charges

A.1

U/s. 294(b), 326, 506(2) I.P.C.

A.2

U/s.323 a






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top