M. Venugopal, J.

1. The Appellant/Petitioner has filed the instant intra-court Writ Appeal as against the order dated 17.09.2012 in W.P.No.14099 of 2007 passed by the Learned Single Judge.

2. The Learned Single Judge, while passing the impugned common order on 17.09.2012 in W.P.Nos.14099, 14499 & 15924 of 2007, had opined that the Respondents had not complied with the provision under Section 11(5) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by issuing and serving notice on the Petitioners and also that they had not taken any further action as per the provision under Section 11(6) of the Act and accordingly, set aside the impugned orders passed by the 4th Respondent, dated 23.10.1997 in Na.K.C.P.81/97D and 14.12.1998 in RC 1280/78D in W.P.No.14099/2007 and dated 25.03.1997 in Na.K.C.P.80/97D and 14.12.1998 in RC 1276/98D in W.P.No.14499/2007; and the order of the 2nd Respondent dated 18.04.1997 in Ref.Rc.469/96A and a final settlement dated 23.07.1997 in W.P.No.15924/2007 and resultantly, allowed the Writ Petitions.

3. The Learned Government Advocate for the Appellants/ Respondents submits that the Writ Court failed to take into account of a fact that the possession of excess land wa