T. K. Chithran vs C. Samsari @ Chithran

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1415

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
T. K. Chithran – Appellant
Versus
C. Samsari @ Chithran – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:V. Maragathavel, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, V. Jeyarani, R2, M. Krishnaveni, Advocate, R3 to R5, No Appearance.

Judgment:-

1. There are two revisions. The first defendant in O.S.Nos.71 and 118 of 2012 on the file of the District Munsif, Natham are the revision petitioners herein.

2. These Civil Revisions have been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to strike off the suits in O.S.Nos.71 and 118 of 2012.

Case No.	Relief	Result	Description of Property	Parties
O S No. 285/2000	Permanent injunction	Decreed on 27/02/2001	S.Nos.303, 304/1, 307/1, 311/2, 314/4 B, 314/5, 316/6 and 315/5 Vadipatti Taluk	T.K.Chitran Ambalam Vs. C.Samsari @ Chithran
District Munsif Court, Dindigul O S No.551/2001 District Munsif Dindigul	Recovery of Possession and for damages	Decreed on 09/01/2004	Item No.1 -Door No.2/106 Item No.2 - 105/A Vadipatti Taluk	T.K.Chitran Ambalam Vs. Samsari @ Chithran and 5 others
EP No. 8/2006	For recovery of possession	Delivery effected and E.P terminated on 20/3/2012
O S 85/2006District Munsif Nattam	Declaration that the decree in O.S.No.551/2001 and E.P.8 of 2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 Supreme(Mad) 1415

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANAT. K. Chithran – AppellantVersusC. Samsari @ Chithran – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA
T. K. Chithran – Appellant
Versus
C. Samsari @ Chithran – Respondent