1. Since the facts and circumstances of the case are one the same in all these Writ Petitions, they are all taken up together and decided by a common order.

2. While W.P.(MD).Nos.18823 and 18824 of 2014 has been preferred by M/s.Saisudhir Infrastructures Ltd and W.P.(MD).Nos.20318 to 20320 of 2014 has been preferred by M/s.IVRCL Ltd, Telugana. Both of them are challenging the action of the respondents in going for a fresh tender for completion of the balance work, which according to the respondents, they have failed to do so, within the stipulated period granted to them.

3. According to the M/s. IVRCL Ltd, Telugana, they have been awarded the contract by the respondents and as per the agreement entered by them, they were directed to complete the said contract work within a stipulated period of mentioned in the contract. Before approaching this Court, according to the petitioner firm, they have completed the contract work awarded to them in the following manner:-