R.SUDHAKAR, R.KARUPPIAH
Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Amrutanjan Ltd. , Chennai – Respondent
R. Sudhakar, J.
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed by the Revenue as against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal allowing the appeal filed by the assessee granting the benefit of Cenvat credit on the service tax paid on outdoor catering services provided in the factory for employees of the factory.
2. The brief facts are as follows:
The assessee in this case availed Cenvat Credit facility on outdoor catering services provided in the factory premises to its employees and that was objected to by the Department stating that outdoor catering services do not fall within the ambit of definition 'input service', specified under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Department was of the view that catering/canteen services were neither used in or in relation to the manufacture or clearance of final product nor it could be said to be an activity relating to business and proceed to disallow the cenvat credit. The Adjudicating Authority vide order-in-original, supported the view of the Department and disallowed the cenvat credit. Aggrieved by the Order-in-Original, the assessee pursued the matter before the Commissioner (Appeals), who
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.