The unsuccessful plaintiff before the courts below is the appellant in this second appeal. The Plaintiff has filed the suit in O.S. No. 81 of 2004 for bare injunction to restrain the defendants/respondents herein from interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property.

2. According to the plaintiff, in the plaint, the first defendant was the owner of the suit property having purchased the same out of her own funds on 01.05.1972. From the said date, the first defendant became owner of the suit property exclusively. The second defendant is the husband of the first defendant. The third defendant is the son of the first defendant. The plaintiff is the son-in-law of the defendants 1 and 2. While so, in order to settle the loan availed by the first defendant with Tindivanam Urban Bank to meet the marriage expenditure of her daughter, the first defendant intended to sell the suit property. The Plaintiff, after deliberations, has purchased the suit property by means of a registered sale deed dated 06.03.2003 executed by the first defendant for a valuable sale consideration of Rs.8,00,000/-. In the said sale deed, the daughter of the first defendant, who was