P.N.PRAKASH
Ilangovan – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector of Police – Respondent
1. Seeking to quash the amended charge sheet filed in SC.No.121 of 2014 on the file of the Mahila Court, Chennai.
2. Heard Mr.M.Vijaya Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Emalias, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.
3. The 1st accused who is the petitioner herein is seeking to quash the amended final report that has been filed by the respondent police, pursuant to a direction from this Court for further investigation under Section 173[a] Cr.P.C. It may be necessary to narrate the brief history of the case. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to by their name.
4. Ilangovan [petitioner/1st accused] got married to Loganayagi [defacto complainant] on 13.06.1985. It is alleged by Loganayagi that her husband and his relatives demanded more and more dowry from her and subjected her to untold cruelty. It is alleged by Loganayagi that on 26.03.1992, Ilangovan approached her in the guise of wanting to have sex with her and he caused tear to her private part with a blade.
5. It may be relevant to state that no complaint was lodged by Loganayagi immediately. After Ilangovan filed a petition for divorce, Loganayagi lodg
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.