V.M.VELUMANI
A. Gomathi – Appellant
Versus
A. Sangeetha – Respondent
This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the appellant/petitioner against the order dated 28.08.2014, passed in S.O.P.No.1 of 2011, on the file of I Additional District Court (PCR), Tiruchirappalli.
2. The appellant is the petitioner in S.O.P.No.1 of 2011. She has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the order of the learned I Additional District Judge (PCR), Tiruchirappalli, partly allowing the S.O.P. granting Succession Certificate, 50% of schedule mentioned properties.
3. According to the appellant, the learned I Additional District Judge ought to have allowed the O.P. in full. The respondent is the daughter of first wife of the appellant's husband Arumugam.
4. The case of the appellant:
The appellant's husband Arumugam divorced his first wife and married the appellant. Her husband by a registered Will, dated 18.03.2008, bequeathed the properties mentioned therein. While, he was alive, he sold one of the items viz., the house property mentioned in the Will, to settle the monies borrowed for his medical expenses. He died on 21.05.2011. He was working in Tiruchirappalli City Co-operative Bank Ltd. When the appellant claimed the death-cum-retirement
M.B. Ramesh Vs. K.M. Veeraje URS and others [2013 (7) SCC 490]
H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma [AIR 1959 SC 443]
Janaki Devi Vs. R.Vasanthi and others [2005 (1) MLJ 357]
Janki Narayan Bhoir Vs. Narayan Namdeo Kadam [2003 (2) SCC 91]
Rengasamy Vs. Rugmini and others [2006 (5) CTC 332]
Kannamaml Vs. Chinnaponnammal [1997 (I) CTC 222]
Sarojini Ammal and another v. Anbazhagan and others
Valliammal and another Vs. Sokkammal [2012 (4) CTC 639]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.