B.RAJENDRAN
Sakthivel – Appellant
Versus
State represented by Forest Range Officer, Thiruvannamalai District – Respondent
1. The petitioner stood charged for the offence punishable under Sections 21 (d), (e), (f) and 36 (A) and (E) of Tamil Nadu Forest Act (Act V of 1982) and after trial before the learned Special Judicial Magistrate (Sandal Wood Offences), Thirupathur @ Vellore District, he was convicted him for the offences punishable under Section 36 (A) and (E) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.7,500/-, failing which to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. The petitioner was acquitted of the offence under Section 21 (d) (e) and (f) of the Tamil Nadu Forest Act. Such conviction and sentence passed against the petitioner was confirmed by the Appellate Court in the appeal filed by him. As against the aforesaid decisions of the Court below, the present Criminal Revision Case is filed.
2. The case of the prosecution as could be seen from the records made available is that on the basis of a tip off received by the officials of the Forest, they have kept a vigil near Sornakulathur Forest Beat on 25.09.1998. At about 5.15 p.m. the officials have spotted the petitioner gaining illegal and unauthorised entry in to the Sornakulathur For
Ashok @ Dangra Jaiswal vs. State of Madhya Pradesh) (2011) 5 SCC 123
Kashmiri Lal vs. State of Haryana reported in 2013 6 SCC 595
T.N. Govindaraman Thirumulkpad vs. Union of India (1997) 2 SCC 267
Assistant Collector of Central Excise
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.