V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Venkatesh Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, Chennai – Respondent
The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition, challenging the order passed by the Regional Passport Officer, refusing to re-issue the Passport for the petitioner, on the ground that there are several criminal complaints pending against him and that the petitioner suppressed information about the same.
2. I have heard Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Ravindranath, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, appearing for the Respondent.
3. The petitioner first applied for a fresh Passport under Tatkal Scheme on 01.08.2007. Therefore, his application was processed, on Post-Police Verification Report basis and a Passport was issued on 07.08.2007 with a period of validity till 06.08.2017. Subsequently, the Police Verification Report dated 01.08.2007 came and it disclosed that a criminal case was pending against the petitioner in Crime No.61/2006 on the file of the Red Hills Police Station. Therefore, the Commissioner of Police did not recommend the issue of the Passport.
4. The petitioner applied for re-issue of Passport with a seal of ECNR (Emigration Check Not Required), on 08.05.2013. In the Police Verification Report date
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.