SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 4521

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Venkatesh Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, Chennai – Respondent


ORDER :

The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition, challenging the order passed by the Regional Passport Officer, refusing to re-issue the Passport for the petitioner, on the ground that there are several criminal complaints pending against him and that the petitioner suppressed information about the same.

2. I have heard Mr. AR.L. Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. Ravindranath, learned Central Government Standing Counsel, appearing for the Respondent.

3. The petitioner first applied for a fresh Passport under Tatkal Scheme on 01.08.2007. Therefore, his application was processed, on Post-Police Verification Report basis and a Passport was issued on 07.08.2007 with a period of validity till 06.08.2017. Subsequently, the Police Verification Report dated 01.08.2007 came and it disclosed that a criminal case was pending against the petitioner in Crime No.61/2006 on the file of the Red Hills Police Station. Therefore, the Commissioner of Police did not recommend the issue of the Passport.

4. The petitioner applied for re-issue of Passport with a seal of ECNR (Emigration Check Not Required), on 08.05.2013. In the Police Verification Report date




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top