R.SUBBIAH
H. Ratnakumar – Appellant
Versus
Gopinath – Respondent
Criminal Original Petition No.10018 of 2013 has been filed by the petitioner to cancel the bail granted to the first respondent / first accused by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.1332 of 2013 by order dated 5.4.2013 and commit him to judicial custody.
2. Criminal Original Petition No.10060 of 2013 has been filed by the petitioner to cancel the bail granted to the respondents 1 and 2 / A.2 and A.3 by the learned XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.1176 of 2013 by order dated 19.3.2013 and commit them to judicial custody.
3. The petitioner in both the petitions is the de facto complainant, the first respondent in Crl.O.P.No.10018 of 2013 is A.1 and the respondents 1 and 2 in Crl.O.P.No.10060 of 2013 are A.2 and A.3 in Crime No.42 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 406, 420 and 506(i) I.P.C. on the file of the respondent police.
4. It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner herein and one Hassan Abdul Kadar are the Director and Managing Director of CCS Infotech Limited. The nature of business of their company is sales and service of Computers, Laptops, computer spares and peripherals. A.1 was running a pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.