1. The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 24.07.2015 in and by which the representation given by the petitioner to initiate action against the third respondent was rejected and consequential direction to the first respondent to conduct an enquiry as to the fraudulent conduct of the third respondent in respect of production of forged documents and to pass appropriate orders on the qualification of the third respondent before finalizing the tender for the appointment of transport contractor for transportation of essential commodities from FCI depots to the storage points of TNCSC in Tirunelveli Region.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the contractor and she has already executed several contracts for the first respondent for the past several years. One of the qualifications for being appointed as a contractor for the first respondent for FCI and non-FCI movements is that the contractor should possess and own minimum number of lorries which are roadworthy. The third respondent herein is in the habit of manipulating records for the purpose of participating in the tenders floated by the first resp