SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2654

S.VIMALA
Soundararajan – Appellant
Versus
State through the Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For petitioners: Mr.N.Anantha Padmanaban, Mr.M.Karunanithi, Mr.C.Nagamuthu
For Respondent:Mr.L.Murugan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

JUDGMENT :

When the involvement of five or more persons in the occurrence itself is made doubtful, in a case involving constructive liability, whether it is safe to rely upon the improved version of witnesses that the number of accused participated were five or more.

2.Whether the acquittal of some of the accused persons, which would have the effect of reducing the number of accused persons less than five, would take out the case from the purview of Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code?

3.When the offence ultimately stood proved was not compoundable on the date of judgment and if it remained compoundable on the date of the offence, whether the compounding may be permitted (in respect of the offence under Section 324 IPC) after the coming into force of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 (Act 25 of 2005) which was notified on 31.12.2009?

4.These are the issues raised in these revision petitions.

5.The revision petitioners are the accused persons 1 to 7 in Crime No.488 of 1999 of Kandarvakottai Police Station. The Trial Court, by the judgment dated 09.05.2006, foun














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top