SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2426

R.MALA
Rathinam – Appellant
Versus
Soriappan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellants : Mr. A. Bobblie
For Respondents: Mr. T.P. Manoharan

JUDGMENT :

This second appeal arises out of the Judgment and Decree dated 17.02.2006 in A.S.No.18 of 2005 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Pollachi confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 07.02.2005 in O.S.No.174 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Pollachi.

2. The appellant as a plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title to the suit property and also mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove the illegal tiled shed put up by them and also for recovery of possession within the time stipulated by this Court, failing which, remove the encroachment through Court and injunction restraining the defendants not to interfere the suit property by putting up new superstructure or by trespassing into the same stating that the suit property is a Natham poromboke and she put up a small thatched shed in the suit property. The plaintiff's mother was staying there and when she went to her son's house, who is residing at Mysore, the plaintiff was in possession of the suit property and confirming her possession, patta has been issued in her name and she was in enjoym



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top