SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2513

S.NAGAMUTHU
Raja – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: J. Sulthan Basha, Legal Aid Counsel
For the Respondent:P. Kannithevan, Government Advocate

Order

S. Nagamuthu, J.

1. The appellant is the first accused in S.C. No. 155 of 2003 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai. Including the petitioner, there were totally five accused in the case. They stood charged for the offences under Section 395 r/w 397 IPC. By judgment dated 25.10.2004, the trial Court convicted all the five accused under Section 395 IPC and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- each, in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed an appeal in Crl.A. No. 246 of 2004. The learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No. III), Madurai, by judgment dated 28.07.2005, dismissed the appeal, thereby confirming the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court. Challenging the same, the petitioner is before this Court with this revision.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows;

"(a) PW2 in this case is one Mrs. Subbulakshmi. PW1 is her husband. PW17 - Mrs. Leelavathi is the mother of PW1. On 09.11.1998, PWs. 2 & 17 alone were in their house bearing Door No. 45-C, at Parth

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top