B. Rajendran, J.

1. The prosecution has come forward with this Criminal Revision Case aggrieved by the order dated 23.06.2015 passed by the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ponneri in C.M.P. No. 164 of 2015 dismissing the application filed by them under Section 216 of Code of Criminal Procedure to alter the charges levelled against the respondents/accused by including Section 302 of IPC as an additional charge.

2. According to the prosecution, the defacto complainant in this case is the wife of victim Velu, who has given a complaint complaining that on 25.09.2006, her husband was forcibly taken by the accused persons towards the sea with an intention to murder him. It is the specific case of the defacto complainant that the 7th respondent herein had given command to his men to bring her husband and on the basis of such command, the accused 1 to 6 have forcibly taken her husband towards the sea. It is also the specific complaint of the defacto complainant that after that incident, the where about of his husband was not known or he was not seen alive by any one from that date. On the basis of such complaint given by the defacto complainant, the case in Crime No.