SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2730

S.NAGAMUTHU, V.S.RAVI
Arun – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants: V. Kathirvelu, Senior Counsel for K. Prabhu
For the Respondent: C. Mayilvahana Rajendran, Additional Public Prosecutor

Judgment

S. Nagamuthu, J.

1. The appellants are the accused 1 and 2 in S.C. No.87 of 2005 on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Tuticorin. Including these appellants, altogether there were four accused. The 2nd accused in the case, Mr. Kumar @ Muthukumar absconded, after framing charges and therefore, the case against him was split up and the same is separately dealt with. The 4th accused Jeffry @ Jeffrin was acquitted by the trial Court.

2. The trial Court framed as many as five charges against all the four accused as detailed below:      

Change No.

Accused

Under Section

1

A1 to A3

342 IPC

2

A1

302 IPC

3

A2 & A3

302 r/w 34 IPC

4

A1 to A3

506(ii) IPC

5

A4

302 r/w 109 IPC

The accused denied the charges. The trial Court convicted the appellants herein alone, who are originally the accused Nos. 1 and 3. After the case was split up, these two appellants were arrayed as accused Nos. 1 and 2 in S.C. No.87 of 2005. They have been convicted. The first accused has been convicted under Section 302IPC and the 2nd accused






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top