K.K.SASIDHARAN
K. Karumarappan – Appellant
Versus
T. Rathinakumar @ T. R. Kumar – Respondent
The petitioner filed a suit in O.S.No.37 of 2011 before the learned District Munsif, Palani. It was a suit for a decree of declaration to declare the sale deed dated 27 May, 2010, executed by the first defendant in favour of second defendant as null and void.
2. The respondent, on appearance, filed a petition under Order 14 Rule 2(2) of Code of Civil Procedure, to try the pecuniary jurisdiction as a preliminary issue.
3. The learned Trial Judge, on a consideration of the matter, directed the petitioner to withdraw the suit and file the same before the appropriate Court, after paying Court fee under Section 40 of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955. The order dated 29 April, 2013 is under challenge in this Civil Revision Petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the sale deed in question was executed by playing fraud and as such, Court fee under Section 25(d) of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, was correctly paid. According to the learned counsel, there is no question of paying Court fee under Section 40 of the Tamil Nadu Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955, on account of the fact that the document was not e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.