SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2692

P.R.SHIVAKUMAR
Manoharan – Appellant
Versus
Panneerselvam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mythili Suresh, Advocate
For the Respondents:V. Raghavachari, Advocate

JUDGMENT

P.R. Shivakumar, J.

1. The above said second appeal came to be filed by N. Manoharan, the plaintiff in the original suit O.S. No. 945 of 1988 on the file of Additional District Munsif, Kallakurichi, who suffered a decree dismissing the said suit in the hands of the trail Court, which decree was also confirmed by the lower appellate Court in A.S. No. 206 of 1996 by a judgment and decree dated 08.02.1999. Pending second appeal, K. Ramanathan seems to have got a sale deed dated 16.06.2008 registered as Document No. 1692 of 2008 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Thiyagadurgam, in respect of the suit property claimed by the original appellant N. Manoharan to be his absolute property. Based on the purchase, the purchaser under the said document, namely K. Ramanathan along with the original appellant N. Manoharan has filed C.M.P. No. 381 of 2015 for impleading K. Ramanathan as a co-appellant. As K. Ramanathan is a purchaser pendente lite, his purchase shall be subject to the result of the second appeal. However, the apprehension of the purchaser K. Ramanathan was sought to be allayed by the vendor by co-opting the purchaser as a petitioner for being impleaded as a co-appellant so t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top