V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, T.MATHIVANAN
R. Aravindhan – Appellant
Versus
K. R. S. Janakiraman (A. K. A. ) – Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian, J.
1. The appeal arises out of a decree for specific performance granted by the Fourth Additional District and Sessions Court, Coimbatore. We have heard Mr. R. Thiagarajan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. C. Krishnan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents.
2. The respondents herein filed a suit in O.S. No. 148 of 2005 on the file of the Fourth Additional District Court, Coimbatore for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 27.1.2005.
3. The case of the respondents in the plaint was that the appellant offered to sell three items of properties more fully described in the plaint schedule for a total consideration of Rs. 1,85,01,000/-; that an agreement of sale was entered into on 27.1.2005 and an advance of Rs. 28 lakhs was paid, at the time of execution of the agreement; that out of the three items of properties agreed to be sold, two belonged to the appellant herein and the third belonged to the appellant's mother; and that under Clause 9 of the agreement, the appellant agreed to have the third item of property also conveyed to him by his mother before the execution and registration of the sale; that unde
Gomathinayagam Pillai v. Pallaniswami Nadar
Govind Prasad Chaturvedi v. Hari Dutt Shastri
Saradamani Kandappan v. Rajalakshmi
Man Kaur v. Hartar Singh Sangha
N.P. Thirugnanam v. R. Jagan Mohan Rao
Pushparani S. Sundaram v. Pauline Manomani James
Manjunath Anandappa v. Tammanasa AIR 2003 SC 1391 = (2003) 10 SCC 390 = LNIND 2003 SC 337
J.P. Builders v. A. Ramadas Rao (2011) 1 SCC 429 = LNIND 2010 SC 1124 = (2011) 2 MLJ 222
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.