B.RAJENDRAN
Durai – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
B. Rajendran, J.
1. The petitioner was arrayed as an accused in C.C. No. 141 of 2002 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri and tried for the offences punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304 (A) of IPC. Upon completion of trial, the trial court convicted the petitioner for the offences under Sections 279 and 304 (A) [3 counts] of IPC. The petitioner was imposed with a fine of Rs.200/- and in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment for the offence under Section 279 IPC; and sentenced to undergo one year rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.2,000/- for each count, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for each count, under Section 304 (A) of IPC [3 counts]. The petitioner was not convicted for the offence under Section 337 IPC. The petitioner unsuccessfully assailed the judgment of conviction passed by the trial court by filing Crl.Appeal No. 4 of 2007 before the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishnagiri as it was dismissed by the Appellate Court on 24.04.2009. As against the same, the present Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner.
2. The facts leading to the registration of criminal prosecutio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.