SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 2226

B.RAJENDRAN
Ravishankar – Appellant
Versus
Sasikanth – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: E. Bubesh
For the Respondents: S.S. Swaminathan

Order

B. Rajendran, J.

1. The first respondent herein has filed a private complaint under Section 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused/revision petitioner herein contending that there were past transaction between the complainant/first respondent and the accused/revision petitioner herein in purchasing of yarn and during the course of such business the complainant/first respondent herein supplied yarn as per the request of the accused/revision petitioner and invoice was raised. However, the accused/revision petitioner did not pay the amount towards supply of yarn. After repeated demands, the accused/revision petitioner issued a cheque dated 11.08.2005 for a sum of Rs. 2,24,078/- towards purchase of yarn and on presentation of the cheque, it was dishonored for the reason "account closed". Therefore, on 04.02.2006, the complainant/first respondent issued a statutory notice. Even though the statutory notice was received by the accused/petitioner herein, he has neither paid the cheque amount nor sent any reply. In those circumstances, the complainant/first respondent herein filed the private complaint in S.T.C. No. 1545 of 2006. Upon trial, the trial court found the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top