SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Mad) 4544

R.MAHADEVAN
C. R. Shankar – Appellant
Versus
N. Alagappan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M/s. J. Jayabalan
M/s. B.Maheswari

JUDGMENT

Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2006 made in A.S.No.97 of 2006 on the file of the learned VII Additional District Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, reversing the judgment and decree passed by the learned XVII Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 11.01.2005 passed in O.S.No.5630 of 2000.

2. It is the case of the plaintiff before the trial court that the defendant borrowed a sum of Rs.45,000/- from the plaintiff by executing a promissory note dated 27.11.1997, at Chennai, in favour of the plaintiff promising to repay the amount with interest at 24% per annum on demand. Despite repeated demands and legal notice dated 23.03.2000 issued by the plaintiff, the defendant failed and neglected to repay the principal and interest amount. Hence, the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.74,190/- with interest at 24% per annum on Rs.45,000/- from the date of the suit till realisation.

3. The defendant filed written statement denying the execution of promissory note by him and his liability to repay the amount, issuance of legal notice by the plaintiff etc. The defendant submitted that he is working as clerk in Indian Overseas Bank and earn





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top