R.MALA
S. Baluchamy – Appellant
Versus
Manikandan – Respondent
The petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition stating that he obtained an order dated 26.06.2015, wherein a direction was issued to the contemnor to complete the enquiry and register the case if any cognizable offence is made out within a period of four weeks.
2. The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the order has been passed on 26.06.2015 and the petitioner sent a contempt notice on 19.07.2015, since he has not complied with the order. Hence, the petitioner has filed this petition stating that the respondent committed the disobedience of the order.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submits that after due enquiry the complaint has been closed on 05.10.2015 and the contemnor also tendered unconditional apology. He further submits that for obtaining documents from the civil Court, there was a delay.
4. Considering the rival submissions and also taking into account the order passed on 26.06.2015, it is appropriate to incorporate the paragraph 3' of the order as follows:
"3. In view of the same, in all these matters, the concerned respondent/competent authority is directed to complete the enquiry within a period of four we
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.