SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3285

T.S.SIVAGNANAM, G.CHOCKALINGAM
T. S. ANBARASU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TAMIL NADU, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT. SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For petitioners:Mr. P. Rajendran for Petitioners 1 to 23 in W.P.No.18793/2012
Mr. A. Ajmal Khan Sr. Counsel for Mr. M. Thirunavukkarasu for Pet., 24 in W.P.No.18793/2012
Mrs. Nalini Chidambaram Sr., Counsel for Ms. C. Uma in W.P.No.4827 of 2012
M/s. K. Jenitha in W.P.No.11607/15 and W.P.No.23712 of 2014
Mr. L. Chandrakumar for Mr. V.S. Sivasundaram in W.A.No.1926/2013
Mr. G. Sankaran and Mr. S. Nedunchezhiyan in WA.SR.No.2165/2015 and W.A.S.R.No.85977 of 2014 and W.P.No.28019 of 2014.
For Respondents:Mr. A.L. Somayaji Advocate General Assisted by Mr. D. Krishnakumar Spl., G.P., and Mr. K. Karthikeyan G.A.

ORDER

T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.

The petitioners filed the Writ Petitions to forbear the respondents from applying G.O.Ms.No.181, School Education (C2), Department, dated 15.11.2011 and insisting on passing in Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) as a minimum qualification for appointment to the post of Graduate Assistant in classes VI to X in the Schools coming under the Directorate of School Education and Elementary Education to the Petitioners who have completed certificate verification process for the said posts based on their employment exchange seniority and for a consequential direction to the Respondents to select the petitioners to the said posts. The Writ Petition was dismissed by order dated 01.03.2012. The petitioner preferred Writ Appeal in W.A.No.1201 of 2012. The Division Bench by judgment dated 13.07.2012, dismissed the appeal against which the appellant preferred Review Application No.139 of 2012 and the Division Bench which heard those Review Application, disposed of the same by order dated 09.07.2013, by directing the respondents to accommodate the Review Petitioners/Petitioners in future vacancies without insisting them to appear for TET. Against the order passed by the Divisi
























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top