SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3229

R.MALA
K. Thirunavukkarasu – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Superintendent of Police – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioner: Mr.M.Suresh
For Respondents:Mr.P.Kannithevan Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner has come forward with this petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking a direction to the first respondent police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.65 of 2015 pending on the file of the first respondent within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

2. Heard the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either side.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, a case has been registered in Crime No.65 of 2015 on 20.04.2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 447, 506(ii) IPC r/w Section 3(1)(r) & (s) 3(2) (va) SC/ST POA Amendment Act Ordinance 2014. However, the second respondent has not shown any interest to investigate the matter and lay a final report. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the present petition for the relief as stated above.

4. Resisting the same, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that the investigation is going on and hence, he prays for four months time to complete the investigation and file a final report.

5. Considering the submissions made on both sides and also



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top