SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3114

C.S.KARNAN
Chitra Goyal – Appellant
Versus
S. Premkumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. U.M. Ravichandran
For the Respondents: Mr. S.R. Sumathy (for R2) R1 – No Appearance

JUDGMENT :

On 01.06.2010, at about 01:00 p.m., when the (deceased) Ashok Kumar Goyal was riding his motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN-07-AT-0275, on the Muthusamy Salai, the Van bearing Registration No.TN-22-AJ-1638, driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner dashed against him. As a result, the (deceased) had succumbed to his injuries, in spite of medical treatment. Hence, the legal heirs of the deceased had filed the claim against the owner and insurer of the offending vehicle.

2. In the said case, the respondents have not filed counter statement, even after receiving notice from the Court. The claimants had filed proof affidavit and two witnesses were examined and 29 documents were marked. After recording the evidence of the witnesses and on perusing the proof affidavit including exhibits, the Tribunal had granted compensation of a sum of Rs.59,64,250/- with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum. Not being satisfied with the quantum of compensation, the claimants have filed the above appeal and sought additional compensation of a sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with interest.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the claimants submits that the claim petition had been levelled o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top