SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Mad) 3032

D.HARIPARANTHAMAN
M. Saradha – Appellant
Versus
P. Selvakumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. V. Bhiman for Mr. V. Mani

ORDER :

The revision petitioners are the defendants 2 to 5 in O.S.No.3102 of 2011 on the file of the Ist Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai. The 1st respondent herein is the plaintiff in the aforesaid suit.

2. The said suit was filed by the 1st respondent/plaintiff seeking to declare the settlement deed dated 28.10.2010 executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the defendants 2 to 5 under threat and coercion on the file of SRO, Purasawakkam, Chennai – 7, as null and void and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 5 their agent, executors or any one through them from interfering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property or in any way alienating or encumbering the suit property.

3. While so, the revision petitioners filed an application in I.A.No.8558 of 2015 in O.S.No.3102 of 2011 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC to reject the plaint. The Trial Court passed an order dated 11.08.2015 rejecting the application in I.A.No.8558 of 2015 in O.S.No.3102 of 2011 and aggrieved against the said order, the present Civil Revision Petition has been filed.

4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

5. It is the contention of the revision





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top