S.MANIKUMAR, C.T.SELVAM
P. Manoharan – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police, O/o. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar District – Respondent
S. Manikumar, J.
Material on record discloses that while noticing the difference of opinion between two groups, vide proceeding in Na.Ka.A1/2662/2015, dated 16.03.2015, the Tahsildar, Virudhunagar, has directed that Arulmigu Karku Vallaiyan Banthi Madasamy Kovil, situated at No.16, Parapatti Street, Virudhunagar Town, be closed, as done in 2013, and that the key of the said temple, be handed over, to him. The said proceeding, dated 16.03.2015, has also been issued, taking note of the difference of opinion, between the two groups, in the Peace Committee Meeting conducted on 07.03.2015 and 12.03.2015 respectively, and also on the basis of the legal opinion, dated 16.02.2015, offered by the learned Government Pleader, District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.
2. Proceeding, dated 16.03.2015, of the Tahsildar, Virudhunagar, has been challenged in W.P(MD)No.4757 of 2015, and vide order, made in M.P(MD)Nos.1 and 2 of 2015 in W.P(MD)No.4757 of 2015, dated 31.03.2015, the Writ Court, has stayed the proceeding, dated 16.03.2015.
3. Added further, Mr. N. Mohideen Basha, learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner, submitted that the abovesaid writ petition, in which, the proceeding dated
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.