SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Mad) 218

P.DEVADASS
B. Raja – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant : Mr.V.Sathish
For Respondent: Mr.P.Govindarajan, Additional Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

The sole accused on the file of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Mahila Court), Chennai in S.C.No.189 of 2010 challenges his conviction and sentence.

2. The said Judge while acquitting him from a charge under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act convicted and sentenced him as under:

Conviction

Sentence

(i) 498(A) I.P.C.

3 years R.I.

(ii) 306 I.P.C.

7 years R.I.

Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

3. The prosecution case runs as under:

(i) The accused/ appellant and the deceased Shenbagavalli were lovers. They have become life partners. They have set up their separate family. They have children.

(ii) On 06.03.2009, at about 8 p.m., Shenbagavalli was brought to the Government Royapettah Hospital with extensive burn injuries. P.W.8 – Doctor noticed several burn injuries on her. (Ex.P4 – Accident Register Copy). She was admitted an in-patient. P.W.10 – Sub-Inspector of Police, received intimation from the said Hospital. He went to the hospital and received Ex.P8 – complaint from the accused. Registered a case for an o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top