“Flagrant violation of law as well as errors of law apparent on face of record would justify High Court interfering with orders in exercise of revisional powers” - Ruled the Supreme Court in a case of “The Managing Director, Nadipissai Pulavar K.R.Ramaswamy Sugar Mills, Mayiladuthurai Vs. A.Fareed Nawa and another, reported in.

2. Challenging the impugned order dated 04.02.2016, passed by the District Court, Kancheepuram, holding that the suit is not maintainable before the said Court and returning the plaint for presentation before proper forum as amounting to flagrant violation of law, this revision petition has been filed by the plaintiff.

3. The petitioner herein, as plaintiff, filed the suit seeking the relief of injunction restraining the first defendant from in any manner dealing with, using, and/or disposing of the items imported by the second defendant under the Export Promotion Capital Goods (EPCG) Scheme, which are installed within the premises of the first defendant.

4. The plaint was returned on 02.02.2016, raising the following questions and the plaintiff has repre